×

Hupspot Guide to DXP vs CMS

Hupspot Guide to DXP vs CMS

Choosing between a traditional CMS and a modern DXP can feel confusing, especially when you want to connect everything in one place like Hubspot. This guide explains the difference between a CMS and a digital experience platform, how they work together, and how to plan a smart, scalable website and experience stack.

This article is based on the concepts in Hubspot's overview of DXP vs CMS, adapted into a practical how-to format.

What Is a CMS in the Hubspot Context?

A content management system (CMS) is software that lets you create, manage, and publish digital content without needing to code every page from scratch. In the context of Hubspot and similar platforms, a CMS usually focuses on:

  • Building and editing web pages
  • Managing blogs and resources
  • Organizing media like images and documents
  • Handling basic templates and themes

Key capabilities you typically see in a CMS include:

  • Visual page builders and WYSIWYG editors
  • Template libraries for landing pages and blogs
  • Basic SEO tools like meta tags and sitemaps
  • User roles for authors, editors, and admins
  • Content versioning and scheduling

In short, a CMS answers the question: “How do we publish and manage content on our site?”

What Is a DXP and How Does Hubspot Fit?

A digital experience platform (DXP) goes beyond publishing content. It connects customer data, channels, and tools so you can deliver cohesive experiences across the entire journey. While Hubspot offers powerful tools in this space, it is helpful to understand the broader DXP idea first.

A DXP typically includes:

  • Content management functionality (often via an integrated CMS)
  • Customer data and profiles across touchpoints
  • Personalization and segmentation capabilities
  • Automation for marketing, sales, and service flows
  • APIs and integrations with third-party tools
  • Analytics and reporting across channels

Where a CMS focuses on the “website,” a DXP focuses on the full experience, including email, apps, portals, and other channels that connect to the same customer data.

DXP vs CMS: Core Differences Explained for Hubspot Users

When you compare CMS and DXP as a Hubspot user or evaluator, you are really comparing scope and integration rather than competing categories.

Scope of Capabilities

  • CMS: Primarily manages web content. Great for blogs, marketing pages, and simple sites.
  • DXP: Manages content plus data, journeys, and experiences across channels.

Customer Data and Personalization

  • CMS: Limited view of visitors; often page-level analytics only.
  • DXP: Unifies behavioral, demographic, and transactional data to drive personalized journeys.

Integration and Extensibility

  • CMS: Can integrate with tools, but usually as separate add-ons.
  • DXP: Designed as a hub with APIs and connectors for CRM, marketing, commerce, and service tools.

Experience Management

  • CMS: Manages what appears on a page.
  • DXP: Manages when, where, and how content and offers appear across multiple channels.

How to Decide Between CMS and DXP with Hubspot in Mind

Use the following steps to decide whether you need a standalone CMS, a full DXP, or a hybrid approach that can grow into a DXP over time.

Step 1: Map Your Digital Experience Goals

Start with your strategy, not the tools. Answer these questions:

  • Do we only need to manage a marketing site and blog?
  • Do we want consistent experiences across email, chat, and site?
  • Do sales and service teams need the same view of the customer?
  • Are we planning apps or portals that reuse website content and data?

If your goals focus mainly on publishing and updating content, a CMS-first approach may be enough. If you want connected journeys, a DXP-style stack with capabilities similar to Hubspot becomes more important.

Step 2: Audit Your Current Stack

List your existing tools and how they connect:

  • Website platform and hosting
  • Blog and landing page tools
  • CRM and marketing automation
  • Email, chat, and support systems
  • Analytics and reporting tools

Identify where data is siloed, duplicated, or hard to sync. These gaps often indicate whether you should move toward a unified DXP-style solution.

Step 3: Define Must-Have Features

Create a simple requirements list and categorize features as “must-have” or “nice-to-have.” Examples include:

  • Drag-and-drop page editing
  • Built-in SEO recommendations
  • Multi-language support
  • Contact-level tracking and segmentation
  • Dynamic personalization based on behavior
  • Built-in A/B testing
  • Native integrations with CRM and email tools

Compare this list to what a standard CMS offers versus what a DXP-style platform, or a unified platform similar to Hubspot, can provide.

Step 4: Consider Scale and Governance

Think about where you will be in one to three years:

  • Will you add more brands or regions?
  • Will non-technical teams manage content?
  • Do you need strict governance, workflows, and approvals?
  • Will personalization and automation become central to growth?

Organizations expecting rapid growth or complex governance often benefit more from investing in a DXP approach, even if they start small with CMS-like functionality first.

Practical Architecture Options for Hubspot-Oriented Teams

There are several ways to architect your experience stack when evaluating options like Hubspot or similar platforms.

Option 1: CMS-Centric Stack

Use a CMS as the core and connect separate tools.

  • Best for: Small teams, simple sites, limited personalization needs.
  • Pros: Lower initial cost, faster setup.
  • Cons: Fragmented data, more manual integration work, harder to scale.

Option 2: DXP-Centric Stack

Adopt a DXP-style platform as the central hub, with integrated CMS, CRM, and automation.

  • Best for: Organizations that want unified data, automation, and multi-channel experiences.
  • Pros: Cohesive customer view, simpler automation, scalable governance.
  • Cons: Requires more planning and change management.

Option 3: Hybrid Evolution Path

Start with a CMS-centric approach and connect more tools over time, gradually moving toward a DXP model.

  • Best for: Teams not ready for a full platform shift.
  • Pros: Incremental adoption, less disruption.
  • Cons: Risk of technical debt and overlapping tools if not planned carefully.

Implementation Tips Inspired by Hubspot Methodology

Regardless of the platform you pick, you can follow a structured rollout similar to what Hubspot advocates in their strategic content and growth frameworks.

1. Start with a Clear Content Model

Define your core content types and relationships:

  • Blog posts, guides, and resources
  • Product pages and solutions
  • Case studies and testimonials
  • Knowledge base or documentation

A clear content model makes migration, automation, and personalization easier later.

2. Centralize Data Early

Decide which system will be your primary customer record. Then:

  • Integrate forms and lead capture to that system first
  • Sync marketing, sales, and service tools to the same profile
  • Standardize fields and naming conventions

This approach supports the kind of unified view that powers strong DXP experiences.

3. Build Reusable Components

Create reusable modules and templates for:

  • Hero sections and CTAs
  • Pricing tables
  • Feature grids
  • Resource cards and blog lists

Reusable components reduce design debt and keep branding consistent across all experiences, whether you are closer to a CMS or full DXP setup.

4. Layer in Personalization Gradually

Start with simple rules, then expand:

  1. Segment by lifecycle stage or industry.
  2. Adapt CTAs based on page behavior.
  3. Use progressive profiling in forms.
  4. Test dynamic content on high-value pages.

This gradual approach mirrors how many Hubspot users grow into more advanced experience management without overwhelming teams.

When to Revisit Your CMS vs DXP Decision with Hubspot

Your first decision is not final. Reassess your stack when you notice:

  • Marketing, sales, and service teams cannot align on customer data.
  • Your CMS becomes hard to extend to new channels.
  • Personalization efforts feel manual and siloed.
  • Reporting across tools is slow or inconsistent.

At those points, it often makes sense to move closer to a unified DXP approach and evaluate platforms that simplify integration and governance.

Next Steps for Evaluating Options Like Hubspot

To move forward:

  1. Document your current tools and gaps.
  2. Clarify your one-to-three-year experience vision.
  3. Prioritize unified data and governance if you plan to scale.
  4. Shortlist CMS and DXP-style platforms that fit your requirements.

If you want help planning a Hubspot-aligned architecture or migration, you can review advisory resources at Consultevo, which focuses on growth platforms and connected digital experiences.

By understanding the real difference between a CMS and a DXP, and by applying structured decision steps, you can design a stack that supports today's needs while preparing for tomorrow's growth.

Need Help With Hubspot?

If you want expert help building, automating, or scaling your Hubspot , work with ConsultEvo, a team who has a decade of Hubspot experience.

Scale Hubspot

“`

Verified by MonsterInsights