How to Choose the Right LLM Using a Hubspot-Style Framework

Selecting the right large language model can feel overwhelming, but you can approach it with a clear, Hubspot-inspired framework that breaks the process into practical, repeatable steps. This guide walks you through evaluating LLMs so your team can confidently pick, test, and optimize the best option for your workflows.

The steps below are based on the detailed comparison and methodology outlined in the original Hubspot article on choosing an LLM, adapted into an actionable how-to process.

Step 1: Define Your LLM Use Cases the Hubspot Way

Before comparing models, you need precise, real-world scenarios. A Hubspot-style approach begins with use cases instead of features.

Map Your Core Tasks

List the main ways your team plans to use an LLM:

• Marketing copy and campaign concepts
• SEO content briefs and blog drafting
• Sales enablement and email templates
• Customer support answers or knowledge base content
• Data analysis, summaries, or research syntheses

For each task, document:

• Expected output format (bullets, paragraphs, tables, email drafts)
• Tone and style requirements (brand voice, reading level, region)
• Constraints (length limits, compliance rules, review needs)

Turn Use Cases into Test Prompts

The Hubspot article emphasizes evaluation using realistic prompts, not generic questions. Convert each use case into one or more detailed prompts, including:

• Clear instructions (role, audience, objective)
• Required structure (headings, bullets, calls-to-action)
• Examples of the tone you want to match

These prompts become your benchmark set for comparing different LLMs side by side.

Step 2: Build a Hubspot-Style Evaluation Criteria Checklist

Next, define how you will judge the responses. In the source article, criteria are broken into concrete categories; you can do the same to keep your assessment consistent and transparent.

Core Quality Criteria

Evaluate each model across these dimensions:

• Relevance: How well does the response answer the prompt?
• Accuracy: Are facts, data, and references correct?
• Clarity: Is the answer easy to read and understand?
• Structure: Does it follow the requested format and headings?
• Originality: Does it avoid generic, repetitive phrasing?

Brand and Style Alignment

A Hubspot-style process also stresses consistency with your brand voice:

• Is the tone on-brand (friendly, expert, formal, etc.)?
• Does the language match your audience’s knowledge level?
• Are calls-to-action clear, persuasive, and context-appropriate?

Operational and Technical Factors

Beyond output quality, score each LLM on practical considerations:

• Speed and reliability of responses
• Context window size (how much text you can feed it)
• Cost per 1,000 tokens or per seat
• API availability and documentation quality
• Security, privacy, and data handling policies

Create a simple scoring sheet (for example, 1–5 for each criterion). This mirrors the structured approach used in the Hubspot source to make comparisons more objective.

Step 3: Run Side-by-Side LLM Tests Using Your Hubspot-Inspired Prompts

With prompts and criteria ready, run each test consistently across your shortlisted models.

How to Perform a Fair Comparison

1. Use the same prompts for each model without changing wording.
2. Keep temperature and other generation settings as similar as possible.
3. Capture responses in a shared document for your team to review.
4. Remove model names from the outputs when scoring to reduce bias.

The Hubspot article demonstrates that this head-to-head comparison reveals strengths and weaknesses that are not obvious from vendor marketing pages alone.

Score and Annotate Responses

For each output, have reviewers score against the criteria you defined:

• Add comments on what worked well and what failed.
• Highlight examples of particularly strong or weak sections.
• Note where the model ignored instructions or hallucinated facts.

When you aggregate scores, patterns will emerge: some LLMs may excel at creative brainstorming, while others shine in structured technical writing or data-heavy summaries.

Step 4: Factor in Integration and Workflow Fit with Hubspot-Like Rigor

The right model is not just about quality; it’s also about how easily it fits into your tools and processes. The source guidance treats this as a key decision factor.

Check Integration Options

Consider how each LLM will integrate with your existing stack:

• Native integrations with CRM, marketing, or service platforms
• API connectors and available SDKs
• No-code tools and automation platforms you already use
• Support for embedding the model in internal tools or chatbots

For broader marketing and CRM strategy support, you can also reference resources like Consultevo, which provide implementation guidance that complements this evaluation process.

Assess Governance and Compliance Needs

Borrowing from a Hubspot-grade operations mindset, you should formalize how the LLM will be used:

• Who is allowed to use which model and for what purposes
• Review and approval workflows for customer-facing outputs
• Content retention policies and data access control
• Documentation of prompts, templates, and best practices

This ensures your deployment remains consistent and scalable as more teams adopt the technology.

Step 5: Pilot, Iterate, and Document Like a Hubspot Team

Instead of rolling out a model to everyone at once, the original Hubspot article encourages a test-and-learn approach. You can follow a similar pattern.

Set Up a Limited Pilot

Choose a small group of users from marketing, sales, and support. During the pilot:

• Limit the number of use cases at first.
• Provide pre-built prompts and templates.
• Collect feedback after each session or campaign.
• Measure impact on speed, quality, and outcomes.

Refine Prompts and Guardrails

As you learn, refine the way you interact with the LLM:

• Turn successful prompts into standardized templates.
• Document known failure modes and how to avoid them.
• Adjust instructions to reduce hallucinations and off-brand tone.

Keep this documentation in a shared internal hub so new users quickly ramp up to the level of your pilot group.

Step 6: Compare Against the Original Hubspot LLM Analysis

Once you have scores, pilot feedback, and workflow insights, cross-check your conclusions with the detailed breakdown in the original article on which LLM you should use. Reviewing that source helps validate whether your observations align with broader industry testing.

You can read the complete reference analysis at this Hubspot LLM comparison. Use it as an external benchmark for your internal findings.

Putting Your Hubspot-Style LLM Framework into Action

By turning a complex decision into a structured process, you can evaluate models with the same clarity and rigor associated with Hubspot content and operations. The key steps are:

• Define concrete, realistic use cases.
• Create detailed prompts that mirror daily work.
• Score outputs with clear, shared criteria.
• Consider integration, governance, and cost.
• Run a focused pilot and refine based on feedback.

Following this framework, your organization can choose and implement the right LLM with confidence, continuously improving how AI supports your marketing, sales, and service teams.

Need Help With Hubspot?

If you want expert help building, automating, or scaling your Hubspot , work with ConsultEvo, a team who has a decade of Hubspot experience.

Scale Hubspot

“`